Slip-and-fall accidents can result in serious injuries. It can be hard to determine who is at fault for an accident. Liability depends on a variety of factors such as the state of the property and the actions of the injured person.
This article will examine factors that determine liability in a slip-and-fall injury. We will also discuss premises liability, and how contributory fault or comparative negligence might impact a case.
Understanding Premises Liability
Premises Liability is a concept of legal liability that holds property owners and occupiers responsible for keeping their property safe for guests. If a person is injured on someone else’s property due to hazardous conditions, the property owner or occupant could be held liable for that injury.
Liability isn’t a given. It is not enough to be injured on another’s property for the owner to be at fault. In order to determine the liability of a slip-and-fall case, you must establish several factors.
Conditions for Proving Fault
To establish liability in a case of slip and fall injuries, certain conditions must be met. These conditions can be used to determine whether the property owner did not maintain a safe atmosphere.
- Duty of Care The property owner or occupier must be responsible for taking care of the injured party. The injured party must have legal permission to be in the premises. Property owners are generally responsible for inviting guests and clients, as well as licensees who come to the premises socially or on an invitation. This rule is not always applicable, for example if the person in question is a minor.
 - Slip-and-Fall Accidents: The accident must have been caused by a hazardous condition such as wet flooring, uneven pavements or clutter on the path. The injured party has to prove that the dangerous condition was the cause of the accident.
 - Knowledge: To hold an owner or occupier liable, it must be proved that they were aware of or should have been aware of the hazardous conditions. Property owners should conduct regular inspections, and address potential hazards as quickly as possible. If the danger has been there for a while and the owner has not fixed it, they may be considered negligent.
 - Failure to Warn or Repair – If the property owner or occupier knew about the danger, but failed to fix it or warn visitors, they could be held liable. For example, if an employee at a shop noticed a spill but didn’t put up a “Wet Floor” sign or clean it up right away, the store may be held responsible for any injuries caused by the slip.
 
Comparative and Contributory Negligence
In slip-and-fall cases, the injured party’s actions are often taken into consideration when determining liability. To determine liability, laws based on comparative and contributory negligence are applied.
- Comparative negligence If a state has laws governing comparative negligence, a person injured may still be entitled to compensation if they were partially at fault for the accident. The compensation they receive will be reduced according to the percentage of their fault. If, for instance, the court determines that the injured person was 20% at fault, (perhaps because they texted while walking), their compensation will be reduced by 20%.
 - Contributory negligence Some state laws are stricter than others. The rule says that if a person injured is even 1% at fault for an accident, they cannot recover damages. This standard is stricter, and it makes it more difficult for injured people get compensation.
 
Slip-and-fall defenses: common defenses
Property owners and their insurance companies often use certain defenses to avoid liability when it comes slip-and-fall injuries. Some of the common defenses include:
- Hazard Open and Evident : One common defense is to claim that the hazardous condition was obvious and open, which means that anyone who had a reasonable mind could have avoided it. The owner of a property can claim that a person who slips on a puddle visible in daylight was responsible for noticing and avoiding the danger.
 - The injured person was negligent. This is another defense. The injured person may have been distracted by texting, or ignored warning signs like “Caution wet floor”.
 - Property Owner Not Aware Of Hazard The owner of the property may be able to avoid liability if they can prove they were not aware of the hazardous condition and that it appeared only shortly before the accident. The store could argue that they did not have enough time to clean the spilled drink or warn customers.
 - Hazard was Temporary. The property owner can claim that the hazardous condition was temporary and that they took reasonable steps to correct it. The property owner could show, for instance, that he or she regularly cleaned and inspected an area where the slip occurred, but the accident happened between regular inspections.
 
Factors that affect liability
The liability in a slip-and-fall case can be impacted by several factors.
- Location of the accident Different laws can be applied depending on whether the accident occurred in a public or commercial space.
 - Status of the injured party As mentioned previously, the duty of care of a property owner depends on the status of the injured party.
 - Timing of accident: The length of time that the dangerous condition was present can be critical in proving liability. If a hazardous condition has been present for hours or days and the property owner did nothing to fix it, they are more likely to be found responsible.
 
What to Do After a Slip-and-Fall Accident
If you are injured in a slip-and-fall accident, follow these steps to protect your legal rights.
- Seek medical attention immediately, even if you believe your injuries are minor. You can use your medical records to prove that you are entitled to compensation.
 - Report the accident as soon as possible to your property owner or manager and request an accident report.
 - Take photos of your surroundings.
 - Get information from witnesses
 - Talk to a personal injuries lawyer who can help you navigate the legal system. They will also determine if you are eligible for a claim.
 
To determine the fault in a case of slip and fall injuries, it is important to examine the actions of both the property owner and the injured party. According to law, premises liability holds property owners accountable for maintaining safe conditions. The actions of the injured can be taken into consideration when determining responsibility. You can increase your chances to prove your fault and receive compensation by understanding the factors that affect blame and taking the appropriate steps after an accident.
This article was written by Jeanette Secor PA Attorney at Law.For over 20 years, the law office of https://www.wonandover.com/ in St. Petersburg, FL, has been the go-to choice for those seeking justice after an injury. Jeanette Secor is a renowned attorney who specializes in slip and fall cases. She has represented clients successfully in motorcycle accidents, car accidents and slip-and falls.
